The mission of Smart Sport International (SSI) is to provide a seamless integration of sports science solutions for training, rehab and life.            Life Is A Sport. Play Smart™.

Subscribe!

         

RunSmart - The Book

Support independent publishing: buy this book on Lulu.

Upcoming RunSmart Level One Clinic in Austin, Texas on 3/7/2010

Syndicate

Principles Of Run Training: 800 meters to 100 miles PDF Print E-mail
Written by Allan Besselink, PT, Dip.MDT   
Wednesday, 18 November 2009

800 meters to 100 miles!Principles define training. Principles can lead you to personal best performances, injury prevention, and health – if they are simply applied correctly.


Historically, running has a social and coaching culture that would have you believe that very diverse methods are required to train for different events. For example, most would assume that training for the 800 meters on the track would be in complete opposition to training for a 100 mile trail run. One is 200 times longer than the other. Currently-held beliefs would tell us that these events utilize different “energy systems”, that one event is anaerobic while the other is aerobic, that one event is for those with lots of fast twitch muscle fibers while the other is only for those with a predominance of slow twitch fibers, that perhaps a specific periodization or structure of training is required, or even more commonly, that perhaps a certain number of miles of training are necessary.


These traditional methods make some assumptions that, sadly, have not stood the test of time or science.


Much of the traditional thinking assumes that the cardiovascular system is the primary limiter of performance – and thus the primary aspect to address in training. But as we’ve built a body of knowledge in the sports sciences, this has been found to not be the case. The central nervous system and neuromuscular system are the primary limiters of performance, and thus issues such as power output should define the training plan. The greater the power output (at any given distance), the faster you go.


What does this mean from a practical application?


I have coached runners of all skill levels and paces, and through a wide variety of event distances. And the one common element that links events like the 800 meters and a 100 mile run is that the training principles are the same. Yes, the same.


There are 3 basic principles that apply to both events.


1. Build your sport performance capacity via a great percentage of your run training being done at your goal race pace – or faster. This will typically be done in interval format. I have termed these sessions “neuromuscular efficiency” (goal race pace) and “neuromuscular power” (faster than goal race pace). This also reinforces improved motor patterns as people generally run better mechanically when they run faster as opposed to slower (relative to the athlete).


2. Build your sport performance capacity – tissue integrity and muscle recruitment - via strength training and plyometrics. In this way, the tissues can remodel such that they are better able to withstand the loads of running, and can do so in a dynamic fashion.


3. Build a training program utilizing principles that foster recovery. This is what I term “recovery-centered training”. Your body will adapt to the imposed demands if given an environment in which to do so. The training mesocycle must be structured to allow for tissue adaptations and recovery to occur, otherwise the specific workouts serve no useful purpose. Training is useless unless recovery and adaptation takes place.


Let’s look at some of the demands of training for these two diverse running events.


  0.5 miles
(800m)
100 miles
(160,000m)

NE or “neuromuscular efficiency” (sustained efforts at goal pace)

yes yes

NP or ”neuromuscular power” (efforts at faster than goal pace)

yes yes

Quality focus

yes yes

Recovery-Centered Training
(focus on tissue repair, recovery, and adaptation to training demands)

yes yes

Strength/Plyometrics
(to increase loading capacity and foster tissue recovery)

yes yes

Periodized Progression (specific and methodical progression of NP and NE sessions)

yes yes

Primary limiter is
neuromuscular system

yes yes

Now let’s describe these events in terms of what is involved in their respective training programs -


For the 800 meter event: the athlete must build their sport performance capacity relative to the event. They must build the capacity of their neuro-musculo-skeletal system. In order to do so, training must consist of work at the goal race pace (and faster), along with strength and plyometric training to develop power and tissue integrity. Running mechanics must be addressed to allow the runner to move more effectively in space. Training must be event-specific – such that neuromuscular efficiency sessions take place on the track.


For the 100 mile event: the athlete must build their sport performance capacity relative to the event. They must build the capacity of their neuro-musculo-skeletal system. In order to do so, training must consist of work at the goal race pace (and faster), along with strength and plyometric training to develop power and tissue integrity. Running mechanics must be addressed to allow the runner to move more effectively in space. Training must be event-specific – such that neuromuscular efficiency sessions takes place on the trail (or terrain similar to the goal event).


Sound familiar? The principles of training remain the same.


It is also important to note that these principles do not change for new runner or Olympian. The difference? The velocity (speed) of run training. An Olympian’s goal paces are higher, and thus their NE and NP training sessions would reflect this. The principles underlying the run training remain the same.


So would it be possible to train for a shorter, faster event and still build the capacity for a longer event? Absolutely! If you have built the power output and capacity, then you should be able to “go longer” simply by altering the speed of movement – and having an effective race management strategy (which includes mental discipline and attentional focus, proper fueling, and appropriate hydration).


The 2009 season has been a prime example of this for Smart Sport athletes. The year has included a Canadian Masters women’s 50 - 54 national best in both the 800m and 1500m, and on the other end of the spectrum, a 21 hour age group 100 mile trail run (which was an over-5-hour personal best improvement!). Both utilized the same training principles in their training programs.


Just a few things to ponder as you refine and optimize your own run training program.


Further information on the concepts presented above can be found in RunSmart: A Comprehensive Approach To Injury-Free Running.


Photo credit: abesselink

Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add
Marshall Burt
...
written by Marshall Burt , November 29, 2009
Blasphemy!!!
You will surely hang for this Besselink!!!
kennedy_josh
Re: is Running Becoming a Health Risk
written by kennedy_josh , December 04, 2009
So a couple of comments and amplification for an already-cogent article:

1) "First of all, I agree with the 'leading a healthy lifestyle mantra'". If you go into RunTex, Fleet Feet, or Reoger Soler's, or other running store with young kids and relative running novices for salespeople, it is likely that they will push a novice runner into loaded up running with shoes with tons of cushion, tons of stability, orthotic inserts, etc. But here's the rub, they will rarely try to gauge your current fitness level, years running experience, injury history, or state of your feet. And sure as hell will not be apt to recommend that you spend some time building raw foot strength by walking barefoot, and then putting you into more minimal shoes at a lower price. See BareFootTed, Caballo Blanco, and "Born to Run" for more on this topic.

2) "But I am not sure where "running a marathon" fits into a front-end goal to fostering an active lifestyle." HELL YES! Running is merely one form of athletic activity, but in novices should form merely a part of other exercise modalities the creative enjoyable, active lifestyles, e.g. walking, hiking, biking, roller-blading, rowing, lifting weights, youga, chopping wood, outdoor gardening, etc, etc.

3) Jumping straight to a marthon (or even half-marathon) is certainly do-able (1000s of people out there can attest to it), but probably not advisable. How many one-time or first-time (slow) marathoners genuinely achieve a health-active lifestyle as a result of training for it and completing the 26.2mi standard? How many poor life habits are abandoned and positive life habits adopted in their place? How many of these folks are racked by serious injuries as a result of a marathon training program that was designed to get someone throught it, but not necessarily build a healthy, strong, injury-resistant body that allows an active and long life?

I mean, hey, it's a free country. If you want to get a marathon t-shirt, I will applaud the effort and even give free advice should you happen to ask me; I know it ain't easy by any means (even with all my years competing). But if you ask me if your training program is appropriate, I am going to steer the conversation away from the marathobn training and find out what it is you'd really like to get out of your body. Is it simple fitness? Is it a toned, lean look that will help you pick up guys (or gals)? Is it to build your personal morale and self-esteem? Is it to help you transition out of an unhealthy lifestyle? Any of these (and more) are valid, reasonable objectives; it's a free country! Whatever the case, simply following some off-the-shelf, Runner's World training program and completing a marathon, IMHO, will rarely do much to meet these objectives. Instead, you are racked with injury, the dreaded memory of the difficulty of the event (rather than the ecstatic feeling of solid, age-based performance), or transitioning yourself.

Rock on, Mr. Besselink.


Write comment

busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 18 November 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Keywords

Highlight and Search

Highlight anything and click below

Related Items