The mission of Smart Sport International (SSI) is to provide a seamless integration of sports science solutions for training, rehab and life.            Life Is A Sport. Play Smart™.



Thought For The Day

It's not accident or time or forture that keeps you from the things you want, but rather, your own thinking.

Lillian Hellman

RunSmart - The Book

Support independent publishing: buy this book on Lulu.

Upcoming RunSmart Level One Clinic in Austin, Texas on 11/7/2010

BlogTalkRadio Shows

Show information and live feed

Call-in number: (646) 929-1567

Allan Besselink, PT, Dip.MDT

View Allan Besselink's profile on LinkedIn

Brooks Inspire Daily Program


In Their Words

Latest Comments

Running Injuries - Part 2
Delphine Manivet design, surface may not make wedding dresses, but always shows ...
Running Injuries - Part 3
Delphine Manivet design, surface may not make wedding dresses, but always shows ...
Running On The Moon
Delphine Manivet design, surface may not make wedding dresses, but always shows ...

SSI Community

138 registered

Visitors Since April 2007

Twitter Updates

Follow Allan on Twitter

Twitter Updates

    Follow Allan on Twitter

    The Home Of SSI



    Site Notice

    Please note that Smart Sport International is slowly migrating to a new location. You will find all of the same news, articles, FAQs, and discussion forums at

    If you have subscribed via email or RSS, your subscription will not be affected. You can also subscribe to the main Smart Life Institute feed here if you want to explore health, fitness, and all the latest news and updates.

    Breaking News

    Click on the slide!

    RunSmart Interview - "The Authors"

    Prior to my book signing at Leeds County Books in Brockville, Canada in August, I was interviewed by Doreen Barnes for BrockNewsTV. They have recently posted the interview online:     Many thanks to Dale…

    Click on the slide!

    BlogTalkRadio 11/10/09: The Injured Runner

    Join me on BlogTalkRadio on Tuesday November 10, 2009 at 8:00 pm central time for the latest episode of "Consumer's Guide To Health". If you're running a winter or spring marathon, you're probably well into…

    Click on the slide!

    MDT: A Powerful Tool With Athletes

    I have spent most of my career working with athletes, be they recreational or elite. They have run the gamut from endurance sports to power sports, and all points in between. Over 12 years…


    Upcoming Events

    Balance And Perception PDF Print E-mail
    Written by Allan Besselink, PT, Dip.MDT   
    Tuesday, 13 February 2007

    I've found myself considering the concept of "balance" a lot recently - not so much in the "maintain a vertical posture in space" realm, but more so with regards to "muscle imbalance". The idea of muscle imbalance isn't what causes me great consternation so much as the perceptual reality defined by someone who has "it".

    Allow me to explain.

    Patients will generally come into our offices with three primary issues - I am in pain, I am unable to move as I normally would, and I have lost some level of function because of one (or both) of these issues. At this time, the perspective is essentially one of "help me understand this problem so I can move on with life".

    Then we as clinicians get our hands on the patient and, suddenly, they have a number of issues that have (apparently) developed over time, perhaps predisposing them now to a dastardly muscle imbalance which, if left untreated and unattended, could perhaps alter their course of being forever.

    The patient comes in with one problem - and effectively leaves with several. Is this "creating solutions" or "more problems"?

    My thought in all of this is that hanging a diagnostic "syndrome" on someone - which is, by definition, simply a cluster of clinical signs and symptoms that happen to occur in the same time and space - is, in effect, fostering a dependent environment.

    "But how can you say this when we teach the patient what to do to solve their problem?" ... the cry rings out from the masses, as clinicians around the globe denounce my observation.

    "Patient education" and "patient compliance" are misguided concepts. Creating an environment in which a person is well-educated and takes responsibility for their self-care is very different from "you're in my office and I am teaching you". I remember countless classes in which I was the victim of a learning environment that was structured for the presenter and not the benefits of the recipient. I was passive. I wasn't actively involved by the instructor in the process of learning. Oftentimes, I didn't see any cause and effect between what I was doing (or reading) and what it would mean to me later in the course (or life).

    And so goes our clinical experiences. There isn't any difference in many ways between the classroom of our youth and our clinical spaces of today - it's just the roles that have changed. Do any of these phrases sound familiar?

    "I want you to do such-and-such before I see you next time."

    "You need to do this-and-that for your problem."

    "Just stop doing what you're doing and it will get better."

    All are phrases that essentially remove active learning from the process. It's all about "me" telling "you" what to do. The recipient is then left to wonder - what's in it for me? Even the best of us are guilty of using these phrases - daily.

    There is a different "spin" (using some political jargon of the day) that can be put on all of this which avoids much of the disablement mentality and fosters an environment that is healthy, constructive, and positive.

    Instead of "you need to do this to fix this long-standing problem", perhaps it should be more about ...

    ... "if you can see the relationship between your symptoms and your limitations, then you can make a choice of whether or not you see a value (for you) in addressing it" ...

    ... followed closely by ...

    ... "and if you so desire, you can put yourself in a much better place (in your normal activities, sports, etc) if you learn to implement certain strategies" ...

    ... followed finally by ...

    ... "and if you choose to do so, I can mentor you in the process".

    Perhaps it's just semantics - but I don't think that's the case. It's truly about perception: the patient's perception of their current reality, and the therapist's perception of their role in the care of the patient - as a guru, educator, fixer, healer, or mentor.

    Perception is reality - and our realities, the patient and the clinician, are not the same. We all have balance to begin with - we just need to use it wisely.

    © 2006 Allan Besselink. All Rights Reserved.


    Tags:  Clinical Mentoring Self Care
    Last Updated ( Friday, 29 February 2008 )
    < Prev   Next >